Tell Congress: Keep the pre-existing condition clause for health insurance

SM_-_iStock_8112453XXXLarge_-_Health_Care.jpg

Who's signing

842 signatures

Will you sign?

For every 1000 signatures, NationofChange will send a letter to Congress demanding that they keep the pre-existing condition clause in their new health care plan.

Before Obamacare it was nearly impossible for individuals with pre-existing medical conditions to find health insurance coverage.

Now that President Trump and the Republican Party are in power and want to repeal Obamacare and replace it with their own health care system, millions of people are once again in danger of not qualifying for health insurance coverage because of a pre-existing condition.

Even those that do qualify may face extremely expensive and/or limited insurance coverage.

Please join us in demanding that Congress retain the pre-existing condition clause for whatever health care system they plan to replace Obamacare with so that millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions can maintain their level of health care without their price skyrocketing.


Showing 845 reactions

  • Bruce Fraidowitz
  • Sign the petition: Tell Congress: Keep the pre-existing condition clause for health insurance
  • Irene O’Neill
  • Sign the petition: Tell Congress: Keep the pre-existing condition clause for health insurance
  • Sign the petition: Tell Congress: Keep the pre-existing condition clause for health insurance http://bullhorn.nationofchange.org/keep_preexisting_condition?recruiter_id=352122
  • Refusing coverage for those with pre-existing conditions helps the insurance companies, but does little for the millions who may be found to have had those conditions – even without knowing it. If insurance companies can’t afford to cover these millions, it’s time for a single-payer system.
  • Robbing Medicaid to give millions to the already rich is an abomination on so many levels & is ridiculous to the extreme. Make REAL budget cuts that do not further burden the already burdened. For instance making Trump et al pay for their own security on all business for profit trips… put a limit cap on Trump “southern White House” related expenses as there is only one White House which already has adequate security in place… same goes for costs at Trump Tower as being Melania’s primary home instead of the White House. That these unnecessary and exorbitant costs are on the backs of the taxpayers is in Trump speak both “BAD!“ AND “SICK!”.

Leaderboard

1
+232sc earned social capital
2
+146sc earned social capital
3
+145sc earned social capital
4
+118sc earned social capital
5
+116sc earned social capital
6
+108sc earned social capital
7
+102sc earned social capital
8
+92sc earned social capital
9
+92sc earned social capital
10
+90sc earned social capital
11
+88sc earned social capital
12
+84sc earned social capital
13
+84sc earned social capital
14
+84sc earned social capital
15
+84sc earned social capital
16
+84sc earned social capital
17
+84sc earned social capital
18
+80sc earned social capital
19
+80sc earned social capital
20
+80sc earned social capital